<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>IJIRCSTJournal</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science and Technology</JournalTitle>
      <PISSN>I</PISSN>
      <EISSN>S</EISSN>
      <Volume-Issue>Volume 9 Issue 4</Volume-Issue>
      <PartNumber/>
      <IssueTopic>Management</IssueTopic>
      <IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage>
      <Season>July - August 2021</Season>
      <SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue>
      <SupplementaryIssue>N</SupplementaryIssue>
      <IssueOA>Y</IssueOA>
      <PubDate>
        <Year>2022</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <ArticleType>Computer Sciences</ArticleType>
      <ArticleTitle>Feminism and the Practice of Gestational Surrogacy in the Identity of the Child and the Woman</ArticleTitle>
      <SubTitle/>
      <ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage>
      <ArticleOA>Y</ArticleOA>
      <FirstPage>98</FirstPage>
      <LastPage>101</LastPage>
      <AuthorList>
        <Author>
          <FirstName>Deelip Saxena</FirstName>          
          <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
          <Affiliation/>
          <CorrespondingAuthor>Y</CorrespondingAuthor>
          <ORCID/>
             
        </Author>
      </AuthorList>
      <DOI>https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2021.9.4.24</DOI>
      <Abstract>In opposition to the spread of gestational surrogacy as a new reproductive practice and women&amp;#39;s labor, this essay examines the limitations of the feminist idea of commercialization of women&amp;#39;s bodies. Surrogacy should be prohibited, according to feminist academics and activists, in order to preserve the unitarily of motherhood and women&amp;#39;s dignity. This theoretical viewpoint obscures women&amp;#39;s decision-making process to participate in free activities, which may be harmful to the female subject&amp;#39;s and other people&amp;#39;s well-being, by thinking that surrogates are victims of imbalanced power relations. In reality, so-called liberal feminists who support legalization and regulation of the practice believe that women should have complete choice over how they utilize their bodies and reproductive potential. In this essay, I propose reclaiming the need to safeguard the kid as the only subject with &amp;quot;no choice&amp;quot; by recognizing surrogates&amp;#39; agency, positing them as subjects of social activities, and reclaiming the need to protect the child as the only subject with &amp;quot;no choice&amp;quot;.</Abstract>
      <AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage>
      <Keywords>Agency, Feminism, Gestational Surrogacy, Motherhood, Surrogates</Keywords>
      <URLs>
        <Abstract>https://ijircst.org/abstract.php?article_id=728</Abstract>
      </URLs>      
    </Journal>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>