A Comprehensive Review on Descriptive Answer Script Evaluation Techniques

Pradeep Rao K B; Thyagaraju G S; Sahana Kumari B; Prasad S R

doi:10.55524/ijircst.2025.13.6.1

Abstract

Descriptive answer script evaluation involves assessing student’s long-form textual answers and it remains a critical and challenging task in educational assessment. Conventional approach of manual grading has shortcoming such as it is time consuming and subjective. To overcome the drawback of manual grading, automated and semi-automated evaluation systems are introduced. This review presents an in depth examination of techniques used for descriptive answer script evaluation. These techniques consists of rule-based methods, machine learning based methods, deep learning based methods, transformer-based and hybrid approaches. Recent advancements in transformer architectures and large language models (LLMs) have greatly improved contextual understanding, scalability, and grading accuracy. In this review, we gather findings from recent studies, and discuss model performance, computational efficiency, and strategies to reduce bias. Despite these advances, significant issues remain concerning generalizability, fairness, explainability, multimodal processing, dataset availability, and pedagogical integration. To address these limitations, there is need of domain-agnostic LLM frameworks, fairness-aware learning, multimodal evaluation, and real-time feedback systems. This review aims to provide researchers and educators with a cohesive view point on current progress, research gaps, and future directions in automated evaluation of descriptive answer script evaluation.

Keywords

Automated Grading, Deep Learning, Large Language Models, Transformer Models

References

F. Moers, "Discretion and bias in performance evaluation: the impact of diversity and subjectivity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 67–80, 2005. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=491023
P. Tayal, P. P. Shetty, R. Harshita, and Sreenath. M. V., "Evaluation of handwritten descriptive responses using machine learning – A survey," in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Futuristic Technologies (INCOFT), Nov. 2023, pp. 1–5. IEEE. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/incoft60753.2023.10425768
S. K. A., N. George, and S. M. Varghese, "Descriptive answer script grading system using CNN-BiLSTM network," Int. J. Innovative Research in Computer Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 139–144, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35940/IJRTE.E5212.019521
Aftan, Sulaiman, and Habib Shah., "A survey on BERT and its applications," in Proc. 20th Learning and Technology Conf. (L&T), Jan. 2023, pp. 161–166. IEEE. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/LT58159.2023.10092289
S. Jagannathan, K. A. Sriram, and P. Vasuki, "Automatic evaluation of answer scripts," AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2966, no. 1, p. 020008, Mar. 2024. AIP Publishing LLC. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0189777
Rahaman, Md Afzalur, and Hasan Mahmud., "Automated evaluation of handwritten answer script using deep learning approach," Transactions on Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14738/tmlai.104.12831
Ait Khayi, Nisrine, Vasile Rus, and Lasang Tamang, "Towards improving open student answer assessment using pretrained transformers," in the international flairs conference proceedings, vol. 34, Apr. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32473/FLAIRS.V34I1.128483
N. Zhou, "Evaluating human and machine assessment: Introducing a hybrid approach for enhanced educational evaluation," Lect. Notes Educ. Psychol. Publ. Med., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 118–124, 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/58/20241716
J. M. Wheeler, A. S. Cohen, and S. Wang, "A comparison of latent semantic analysis and latent Dirichlet allocation in educational measurement," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics , vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 848–874, 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986231209446
[10] H. Ahmed, S. Hina, and R. Asif, "Evaluation of descriptive answers of open-ended questions using NLP techniques," In 2021 4th International Conference on Computing & Information Sciences(ICCIS), Nov. 2021, pp. 1–7. IEEE. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/iccis54243.2021.9676405
Rozeva, Anna, and Silvia Zerkova, "Assessing semantic similarity of texts – methods and algorithms," AIP Conference Proceedings ,vol. 1910, no. 1, Dec. 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5014006
N. Prabakaran, R. Kannadasan, and A. Krishnamoorthy, "A bidirectional LSTM approach for written script auto evaluation using keywords-based pattern matching," Natural Language Processing Journal, vol. 5, p. 100033, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100033
G. Kortemeyer, "Performance of the pre-trained large language model GPT-4 on automated short answer grading," Discover Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 47, 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00147-y
S. B. Ashoka, K. Deep, G. Goutham, S. M. M. Ganihar, P. K. Udayaprasad, G. C. Lakshmikantha, and P. Dayananda, "Efficient automated evaluation of answer scripts using LLMs, NLP, and deep learning," In Data Science & Exploration in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 484–491, 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003589273-72
Manikandan, R., RN Yakshith Sai, G. Vignavi, G. Santhosh Kumar Reddy, and N. Sri Dharshani Reddy, "Evaluating subjective answers using RNN and NLP," In Challenges in Information, Communication and Computing Technology, pp. 681–686, 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003559085-117
V. S. Singh, A. Verma, G. Srivastava, and S. Kumar, "Exam assessor tool: An automated system for efficient answer sheet evaluation," Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, vol. 17,no. 6,pp. 36-57, 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i6455
C. Wangwiwattana and Y. Tongvivat, "Automating academic assessment: A large language model approach," In 2023 7th International Conference on Information Technology (InCIT), pp. 330–334, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/incit60207.2023.10412991
J. Metan, D. Kumar, and H. Kumar, "An automated approach to subjective answer evaluation using ML and NLP," in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Advances in Information Technology (ICAIT), vol. 1, July 2024, pp. 1–7. IEEE. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/icait61638.2024.10690635
S. Konade, Y. Hirgude, A. Kulkarni, A. Jadhav, and L. Sonar, "Implementation of an automated answer evaluation system," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (IC2PCT), vol. 5, Feb. 2024, pp. 457–462. IEEE. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ic2pct60090.2024.10486693
A. R. Matos, "Semantic similarity based automated answer script evaluation system using machine learning pipeline and natural language processing," Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 495–509, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9819-5_36
I. D. Dada, A. T. Akinwale, I. A. Osinuga, H. N. Ogbu, and T. Tunde-Adeleke, "IAttention transformer: An inter-sentence attention mechanism for automated grading," Mathematics, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 2991, 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/math13182991
M. Selvam and R. G. Vallejo, "Human-in-the-loop models for ethical AI grading: Combining AI speed with human ethical oversight," EthAIca: J. Ethics, AI and Critical Analysis, vol. 4, p. 413, 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.56294/ai2025413
P. Suryakumar, A. Malini, S. K. Subasini, G. Priyanka, and V. Sandhiya, "Aivaluate: A multi-agent framework for automated answer script evaluation using large language models and semantic vector indexing," IEEE Access, 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3608158
H. Zhu, T. Li, P. He, and J. Zhou, "Enhancing automated grading in science education through LLM-driven causal reasoning and multimodal analysis," 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/1150
M. A. Sura, M. Rai, S. Khetarpaul, and S. Mishra, "AASE: AI-driven automated answer script evaluation," Authorea Preprints, 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6895375/v1
Y. Chu, H. Li, K. Yang, H. Shomer, H. Liu, Y. Copur-Gencturk, and J. Tang, "A LLM-powered automatic grading framework with human-level guidelines optimization," arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02165, 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2410.02165
X. Wu, P. P. Saraf, G. Lee, E. Latif, N. Liu, and X. Zhai, "Unveiling scoring processes: Dissecting the differences between LLMs and human graders in automatic scoring," Technology, Knowledge and Learning, pp. 1–16, 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.18328
J. H. Christyodetaputri and N. Marwa, "Realizing ethical and equitable assessment in global education through artificial intelligence," Sinergi Int. J. Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 170–186, 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.61194/education.v2i3.590
Y. Asazuma, H. Funayama, Y. Matsubayashi, T. Mizumoto, P. Reisert, and K. Inui, "Take no shortcuts! Stick to the rubric: A method for building trustworthy short answer scoring models," Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 337–358, 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67351-1_23
S. R. Boreddy, "AI-driven handwritten assignment analysis and evaluation," International Journal for Science Technology and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 6810–6815, 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.70012
W. Xie, J. Niu, C. J. Xue, and N. Guan, "Grade like a human: Rethinking automated assessment with large language models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19694, 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.19694
S. A. Mahmood and M. A. Abdul samad, "Automatic assessment of short answer questions: Review," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 9158–9176, 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3956
D. C. Gabon, A. A. Vinluan, and J. T. Carpio, "Evaluating student communication skills and user acceptability of an NLP-based automated essay grading system," European Journal of Teaching and Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 30–40, 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33422/ejte.v7i3.1531

Cites this article as

P. R. K. B, T. G. S, S. K. B, P. S. R, "A Comprehensive Review on Descriptive Answer Script Evaluation Techniques", International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science and Technology (IJIRCST), Vol-13, Issue-6, Page No-1-7, 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2025.13.6.1

Corresponding Author

Pradeep Rao K B

Assistant Professor, Department of CSE, Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara Institute of Technology, Ujire, Karnataka, India

Download Full Paper

Download PDF

No. of Downloads: 76 | No. of Views: 3029

Edugenie: AI-Powered Adaptive Quiz Generation and Personalized Learning Platform

Mohd Nasir, Mohd Faheem, Mohd Faizan, Ankita Srivastava.

May 2026 - Vol 14, Issue 3
Explainable Hierarchical Multi-Task Learning for Multi-Level Student Performance Prediction

Shivangi Srivastava, Vishal Bharati.

May 2026 - Vol 14, Issue 3
AI-Enhanced Repair Management and Electronic Lifecycle Techniques

Venkatesh Patil, Harshad Lokhande, Saloni Patil, Swamini Phapale, Prasad Donglikar.

May 2026 - Vol 14, Issue 3

A Comprehensive Review on Descriptive Answer Script Evaluation Techniques

Citations

Download Full Paper PDF

Total View 3029

Total Download 76