Comparison between Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods through Objective Weighting Method in Determining Best Employee

Andre Hasudungan Lubis; Nurul Khairina; Muhammad Fikri Riandra

doi:10.55524/ijircst.2023.11.2.10

Abstract

Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) is a popular method to be selected in numerous studies in solving decision-making cases. Methods like SAW, WASPAS, SMART, and WP are preferred among researchers to be used for many purposes. However, the best method still not compared in determining best employee. Hence, the study conducted the comparison between the methods by using the Rank Similarity Index (RSI). The index is used to express the most appropriate method. In terms of weighting, we propose the D-CRITIC method as the tool to support the comparison procedure. Moreover, we select the bus driver as the sample case of the study with total of 10 candidates are nominated to be chosen as the best. The company has given the rank list before, so we just compare the actual rank with the result of MADM methods calculations. The result shows that SAW and WASPAS are the methods with the highest similarity towards the rank. Furthermore, these methods also reach the great score of the RSI between the others.

Keywords

MADM, Comparison, Best Employee, Objective Weighting, RSI.

References

[1] A. Alinezhad and J. Khalili, New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision making (MADM), vol. 277. Springer, 2019.

[2] G.-H. Tzeng and J.-J. Huang, Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. CRC press, 2011.

[3] A. Memariani, A. Amini, and A. Alinezhad, “Sensitivity analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW): the results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives,” 2009.

[4] L. Abdullah and C. W. R. Adawiyah, “Simple additive weighting methods of multi criteria decision making and applications: A decade review,” Int. J. Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 39, 2014.

[5] M. Megawaty and M. Ulfa, “Decision Support System Methods: A Review,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 192–201, 2020.

[6] A. Mardani et al., “A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 57, pp. 265–292, 2017.

[7] A. Kandakoglu, A. Frini, and S. Ben Amor, “Multicriteria decision making for sustainable development: A systematic review,” J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., vol. 26, no. 5–6, pp. 202–251, 2019.

[8] R. Rosidin and Y. Ramdhani, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Pada LPK Pelita Massa Berbasis Web,” ULIL ALBAB J. Ilm. Multidisiplin, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1114–1122, 2022.

[9] J. Hutahaean, S. Suriani, M. Amin, Z. Azhar, and others, “Implementation of Simple Additive Weighting Method in Evaluating Employee Performance for Job Promotion Recommendations.,” Webology, vol. 19, no. 1, 2022.

[10] A. Zumarniansyah, R. Ardianto, Y. Alkhalifi, and Q. N. Azizah, “Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 75–81, 2021.

[11] D. Witasari and Y. Jumaryadi, “Aplikasi Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw)(Studi Kasus Citra Widya Teknik),” JUST IT J. Sist. Informasi, Teknol. Inf. dan Komput., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 115–122, 2020.

[12] A. Ahmad and Y. I. Kurniawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Terbaik Menggunakan Simple Additive Weighting,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 2020.

[13] O. Sihombing et al., “Determining outstanding employee using simple multi-attribute rating technique method,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1230, no. 1, p. 12076.

[14] R. Fahlepi, “Decision Support Systems Employee Discipline Identification Using The Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) Method,” J. Appl. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 103–112, 2020.

[15] N. Dewi, R. H. Laluma, E. Garnia, D. Saepudin, N. Hendajany, and others, “Employee Performance Assessment System Design Based on 360 Degrees Feedback and Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Method Integration,” in 2020 14th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications (TSSA, 2020, pp. 1–4.

[16] I. Arfyanti, E. Yulsilviana, and M. Iqbal, “Decision Support System Selection of Achievement Employees in PT PLN (PERSERO) UP3 Samarinda using Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) Method,” Tepian, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–16, 2021.

[17] M. A. Dewi, D. F. Murad, and others, “Implementation of the SMART Models for Application Development Employee Performance Appraisal,” in 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET), 2019, pp. 364–369.

[18] T. N. Sianturi, L. Siburian, R. G. Hutagaol, and S. H. Sahir, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Bank Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS),” in Seminar Nasional Sains dan Teknologi Informasi (SENSASI), 2018, vol. 1, no. 1.

[19] M. Handayani, N. Marpaung, and S. Anggraini, “Implementasi Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS) Dalam Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Berbasis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Information Science (SENARIS), 2019, vol. 1, pp. 1098–1106.

[20] M. Handayani and N. Marpaung, “Implementasi Metode Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (Waspas) Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Laboratorium,” in Seminar Nasional Royal (SENAR), 2018, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 253–258.

[21] F. T. Hafis, R. I. Ginting, and D. Suherdi, “Decision Support System Dalam Pemilihan Pegawai Terbaik Kantor Inspektorat Medan Menggunakan Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS),” J. Cyber Tech, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 364–375, 2020.

[22] M. Mesran, S. Suginam, and D. P. Utomo, “Implementation of AHP and WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) Methods in Ranking Teacher Performance,” IJISTECH (International J. Inf. Syst. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 173–182, 2020.

[23] N. Aminudin, E. Sundari, K. Shankar, P. Deepalakshmi, R. I. Fauzi, and A. Maseleno, “Weighted Product and its application to measure employee performance,” Int. J. Eng. \& Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.26, pp. 102–108, 2018.

[24] I. Nurkhallam and S. Siswanto, “Penerapan Algoritma Weighted Product untuk Penentuan Pegawai Terbaik Badan LITBANG,” Pros. SISFOTEK, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2019.

[25] M. Mujito, “Penerapan Metode Weighted Product (WP) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Pegawai Terbaik,” JISI (Jurnal Ilm. Sist. Informasi), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2022.

[26] T. Ismariyati, R. Wulantika, and S. Mukodimah, “Pengambilan Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Kecamatan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Ulubelu),” JTKSI, vol. 3, no. 02, pp. 54–60, 2020.

[27] F. Rizki and N. I. Fada, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Kenaikan Pangkat Jabatan Fungsional Pegawai Terbaik Berdasarkan Nilai Angka Kredit Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product dan Promethee,” Aisyah J. Informatics Electr. Eng., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 83–96, 2020.

[28] M. Žižovi?, B. Miljkovi?, and D. Marinkovi?, “Objective methods for determining criteria weight coefficients: A modification of the CRITIC method,” Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 149–161, 2020.

[29] H. Deng, C.-H. Yeh, and R. J. Willis, “Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights,” Comput. \& Oper. Res., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 963–973, 2000.

[30] M. Alemi-Ardakani, A. S. Milani, S. Yannacopoulos, and G. Shokouhi, “On the effect of subjective, objective and combinative weighting in multiple criteria decision making: A case study on impact optimization of composites,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 46, pp. 426–438, 2016.

[31] X. Peng, X. Zhang, and Z. Luo, “Pythagorean fuzzy MCDM method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC with score function for 5G industry evaluation,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 3813–3847, 2020.

[32] A. R. Krishnan, M. M. Kasim, R. Hamid, and M. F. Ghazali, “A modified CRITIC method to estimate the objective weights of decision criteria,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 6, p. 973, 2021.

[33] M. M. Rohani, D. C. Wijeyesekera, and A. T. A. Karim, “Bus operation, quality service and the role of bus provider and driver,” Procedia Eng., vol. 53, pp. 167–178, 2013.

[34] A. Razak, S. Sarpan, and R. Ramlan, “Effect of leadership style, motivation and work discipline on employee performance in PT. ABC Makassar,” Int. Rev. Manag. Mark., vol. 8, no. 6, p. 67, 2018.

[35] N. V Wünderlich, A. Gustafsson, J. Hamari, P. Parvinen, and A. Haff, “The great game of business: Advancing knowledge on gamification in business contexts,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 106. Elsevier, pp. 273–276, 2020.

[36] D. Darmawan et al., “The Quality of Human Resources, Job Performance and Employee Loyalty,” Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 2580–2592, 2020.

[37] M. Modarres and S. Sadi-Nezhad, “Fuzzy simple additive weighting method by preference ratio,” Intell. Autom. \& Soft Comput., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 235–244, 2005.

[38] M. R. Patel, M. P. Vashi, and B. V. Bhatt, “SMART-Multi-criteria decision-making technique for use in planning activities,” Proc. New Horizons Civ. Eng. (NHCE-2017), Surat India, 2017.

[39] E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, J. Antucheviciene, and A. Zakarevicius, “Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment,” Elektron. ir elektrotechnika, vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 3–6, 2012.

[40] S. Chakraborty and E. K. Zavadskas, “Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making,” Informatica, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2014.

[41] J. R. S. C. Mateo, “Weighted sum method and weighted product method,” in Multi criteria analysis in the renewable energy industry, Springer, 2012, pp. 19–22.

[42] S. Chakraborty and C.-H. Yeh, “Rank similarity based MADM method selection,” in 2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE), 2012, pp. 1–6.

[43] N. Chitsaz and M. E. Banihabib, “Comparison of different multi criteria decision-making models in prioritizing flood management alternatives,” Water Resour. Manag., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 2503–2525, 2015.

Cites this article as

A. H. Lubis, N. Khairina, M. F. Riandra, "Comparison between Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods through Objective Weighting Method in Determining Best Employee", International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (ijircst), Vol-11, Issue-2, Page No-50-57, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2023.11.2.10

Corresponding Author

Andre Hasudungan Lubis

Lecturer, Informatic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Medan Area, Medan, Indonesia

Download Full Paper

Download PDF

No. of Downloads: 57 | No. of Views: 1195

A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity

Manali Shukla, Ishika Goyal, Bhavya Gupta, Jhanvi Sharma.

July 2024 - Vol 12, Issue 4
Helmet Detection and Number Plate Recognition Using YOLOv8 and Tensorflow Algorithm in Machine Learning

Dipti Prajapati, Samishtarani Sabat, Sanika Bhilare, Rashmi Vishe, Prof. Suman Bhujbal.

March 2024 - Vol 12, Issue 2
Machine Learning Prospects: Insights for Social Media Data Mining and Analytics

Anu Sharma, Vivek Kumar.

May 2023 - Vol 11, Issue 3

Comparison between Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods through Objective Weighting Method in Determining Best Employee

Citations

Download Full Paper PDF

Total View 1195

Total Download 57