Volume- 9
Issue- 3
Year- 2021
DOI: 10.55524/ijircst.2021.9.3.18 | DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2021.9.3.18
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Sonu Garg
This paper shows that assembling thought as well as actor-network theory (ANT) have such a great deal in common than the debate suggests. It proposes three cross-fertilizations depending on intersections as well as disjunctions among the two techniques, with implications for comprehending three key socio-material processes: stability, transformation, as well as affect. To begin with, ANT's conceptual language may aid assemblage thinking by offering a spatial account of how aggregates are brought collectively, extended over space, and stabilize. Secondly, each technique is better adapted to thinking about a certain type of variation in socio-material interactions: ANT depicts change without rupture (fluidity), whereas assemblage thinking depicts change with rupture (events). Finally, assemblages thought has the ability to instil in ANT a greater understanding of affect's generative role in the construction of socio-material links through the establishment of desire/wish. We demonstrate the implications of this cross-fertilization for empirical studies through a case study of the global market for assisted reproduction.
[1] S. Goel, R. K. Dwivedi, and A. Sharma, “Analysis of social network using data mining techniques,” 2020, doi: 10.1109/SMART50582.2020.9337153.
[2] S. Tripathi, P. K. Verma, and G. Goswami, “A review on SMART GRID power system network,” 2020, doi: 10.1109/SMART50582.2020.9337067.
[3] B. Gupta, K. K. Gola, and M. Dhingra, “Wireless Sensor Networks: ‘A Review on Replica Detection Techniques,’” 2020, doi: 10.1109/SMART46866.2019.9117544.
[4] M. Müller and C. Schurr, “Assemblage thinking and actor-network theory: conjunctions, disjunctions, cross-fertilisations,” Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 2016, doi: 10.1111/tran.12117.
[5] S. M. Mian and R. Kumar, “Review on Intend Adaptive Algorithms for Time Critical Applications in Underwater Wireless Sensor Auditory and Multipath Network,” 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICACTM.2019.8776782.
[6] M. Tahira, D. Ather, and A. K. Saxena, “Modeling and evaluation of heterogeneous networks for VANETs,” 2018, doi: 10.1109/SYSMART.2018.8746981.
[7] V. Saxena, D. Rastogi, and R. Kumar, “Challenge in route discovery process of dynamically arranged multitier Protocol in wireless network,” 2017, doi: 10.1109/SYSMART.2016.7894514.
[8] A. Whittle and A. Spicer, “Is actor network theory critique?,” Organ. Stud., 2008, doi: 10.1177/0170840607082223.
[9] P. Gupta, V. Prakash, and P. Suman, “Noticeable key points and issues of sensor deployment for large area Wireless Sensor Network: A survey,” 2017, doi: 10.1109/SYSMART.2016.7894511.
[10] D. Boullier, “Médialab stories: How to align actor network theory and digital methods,” Big Data Soc., 2018, doi: 10.1177/2053951718816722.
[11] A. Sharma, M. K. Sharma, and R. K. Dwivedi, “Novel approach of mining methods for social network sites,” 2017, doi: 10.1109/SYSMART.2016.7894515.
[12] S. K. Sharma, A. Jain, K. Gupta, D. Prasad, and V. Singh, “An internal schematic view and simulation of major diagonal mesh network-on-chip,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., 2019, doi: 10.1166/jctn.2019.8534.
[13] M. Yadav, S. K. Gupta, and R. K. Saket, “Multi-hop wireless ad-hoc network routing protocols- a comparative study of DSDV, TORA, DSR and AODV,” 2015, doi: 10.1109/EESCO.2015.7253703.
[14] K. K. Gola, B. Gupta, and G. Khan, “Underwater sensor networks: A heuristic approach for void avoidance and selection of best forwarder,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 2019.
[15] N. Agrawal, A. Jain, and A. Agarwal, “Simulation of network on chip for 3D router architecture,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., 2019.
[16] L. M. Montenegro and S. Bulgacov, “Reflections on actor-network theory, governance networks, and strategic outcomes,” BAR - Brazilian Adm. Rev., 2014, doi: 10.1590/S1807- 76922014000100007.
[17] E. Sayes, “Actor-Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency?,” Soc. Stud. Sci., 2014, doi: 10.1177/0306312713511867.
[18] D. Elder-Vass, “Disassembling Actor-network Theory,” Philos. Soc. Sci., 2015, doi: 10.1177/0048393114525858.
[19] R. Jha and A. K. Saini, “A comparative analysis & enhancement of NTRU algorithm for network security and performance improvement,” 2011, doi: 10.1109/CSNT.2011.23.
[20] A. Bilodeau and L. Potvin, “Unpacking complexity in public health interventions with the Actor-Network Theory,” Health Promotion International. 2018, doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw062.
[21] F. Muniesa, “Actor-Network Theory,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 2015.
[22] R. Burga and D. Rezania, “Project accountability: An exploratory case study using actor–network theory,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.001.
[23] L. Bala and A. K. Vatsa, “Quality based Bottom-up-Detection and Prevention Techniques for DDOS in MANET,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., 2012, doi: 10.5120/8726-2412.
[24] N. Kishore and S. Singh, “Torque ripples control and speed regulation of Permanent magnet Brushless dc Motor Drive using Artificial Neural Network,” 2014, doi: 10.1109/RAECS.2014.6799498.
[25] Y. Shim and D. H. Shin, “Analyzing China’s Fintech Industry from the Perspective of Actor-Network Theory,” Telecomm. Policy, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.11.005.
Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, India
No. of Downloads: 17 | No. of Views: 674
Dr. A. Seshagiri Rao, V. Nagarjuna, M. Sivudu.
November 2022 - Vol 10, Issue 6
Dr. Satish Saini.
March 2022 - Vol 10, Issue 2
Krishna Tomar.
March 2022 - Vol 10, Issue 2