International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering and Management
Year: 2015, Volume: 3, Issue: 4
First page : ( 57) Last page : ( 60)
Online ISSN : 2350-0557.
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
N. Vivekanandan
Prediction of rainfall, temperature and wind speed is of utmost importance for planning, design and management of the civil structures at the project site. This can be carried out by fitting of probability distributions to the observed data. This paper illustrates the adoption of Gumbel (EV1) and Frechet (EV2) distributions for modelling of annual extreme rainfall, temperature and wind speed for Kanyakumari. Order Statistics Approach is used for determination of parameters of EV1 and EV2 distributions. Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) tests viz., Anderson-Darling and Kolmogorov-Smirnov are used for checking the adequacy of fitting of the distributions. Model Performance Indicators (MPIs) such as root mean square error and correlation coefficient are used for evaluating the performance of the probability distributions adopted in modelling of rainfall, temperature and wind speed. Based on GoF tests results and MPIs, the study recommends the EV1 distribution is better suited distribution for modelling of annual extreme rainfall and temperature whereas EV2 for annual extreme wind speed for Kanyakumari.
[1] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Meteorological events in site evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants – IAEA Safety Guide, No. Ns-G-3.4, Vienna, 2003.
[2] A.H. Ang and W.H. Tang, Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, Vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, 1984.
[3] M.C. Casas, R. Rodriguez, M. Prohom, A. Gazquez, and A. Redano, “Estimation of the probable maximum precipitation in Barcelona (Spain)”, Journal of Climatology, 2011, Vol. 31, No. 9, pp. 1322–1327.
[4] H. Hasan, N. Salam and M.B. Adam, “Modelling extreme temperature in Malaysia using generalized extreme value distribution, International Journal of Mathematical, Computational, Natural and Physical Engineering, 2013, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 618-624 .
[5] L. S. Esteves, “Consequences to flood management of using different probability distributions to estimate extreme rainfall”, Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, Vol. 115, No. 1, pp. 98-105.
[6] B. A. Olumide, M. Saidu and A. Oluwasesan, “Evaluation of best fit probability distribution models for the prediction of rainfall and runoff volume (Case Study Tagwai Dam, Minna-Nigeria)”, Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2013, Vo1. 3, No. 2, pp. 94-98.
[7] B.H. Lee, D.J. Ahn, H.G. Kim and Y.C. Ha, “An estimation of the extreme wind speed using the Korea wind map”, Renewable Energy, 2012, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 4–10.
[8] R. Daneshfaraz, S. Nemati, H. Asadi and M. Menazadeh, “Comparison of four distributions for frequency analysis of wind speed: A case study”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism, 2013, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 6-11.
[9] Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB), “Extreme values of meteorological parameters”, AERB/ NF/ SG/ S-3, 2008.
[10]N. Cook, “Comments on plotting positions in extreme value analysis”, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2011, Vol. 50, No.1, pp. 255-266.
[11]P.E. Charles Annis, “Goodness-of-Fit tests for statistical distributions”, [http://www.statistical engineering.com/goodness.html], 2009.
[12]J. Chen and B. J. Adams, “Integration of artificial neural networks with conceptual models in rainfall-runoff modelling”, Journal of Hydrology, 2006, Vol. 318, No, 1-4, pp. 232-249.
Assistant Research Officer, Hydrometeorology Division, Central Water and Power Research Station, Pune 411024, Maharashtra; Phone: (020) 24103367; E-mail: anandaan@ rediffmail.com
No. of Downloads: 10 | No. of Views: 1194
